Type 2: No choice, everyone must be mRNA injected (Control)
Type 3: Don't believe in untested drugs (Freedom)
Each group are very different in their philosophy and there is evidence to support each mantra.
- One is human rights based on equality.
- The other is science and research based and comes up with alternate facts to what is being sold to the public by the Government and are a constant thorn in the Prime ministers side.
"Freedom is people's inherent foundation."
'No choice, you must have an untested drug injected into your body."
"If you only have proof a drug worked after you injected everyone with it, that was an experiment and you will need to wait a while to know the outcome."
- You are declaring your knowledge is far superior but cannot back it up.
- You are injecting your drugs into our loved ones, including our children.
- You are trying to talk you way out of answering some very simple questions by diverting to something else.
- You use every psychological trick in the book to tell us that our nature is no good and only science knows the way.
- You are trying to convince the abused that they have not been abused.
False Belief 1:
"Millions have been injected so therefore it must be safe!"
False Belief 2:
Natural Immunity Doesn't Work
- The PM states "The problem IS the Unvaccinated" as a FACT even though it is only a hypothesis.
- When the Government says that they are the only true source of information, and we hear this kind of non-factual statement, we are confused as to what we should believe.
- She is guessing her way and forming supposed facts from her opinions
- Her conversation indicates that she doesn't understand immunity
- She was just 'following experts' but doesn't site any references
- Clearly identifying a minority group in society that everyone else could blame for Covid and inciting public fear of the 'unvaccinated'
- The PM purposely caused discrimination
- The Vaccine Passport idea was trying to establish a mechanism to enforce discrimination
- Not looking after the rights and beliefs of minorities who had facts and irrefutable evidence on their side
False Belief 3:
Trust the Science
Freedom Is Something Our Ancestors Fought For,
But Most of us Just Let It Go!
The code of conduct for medical research involving human subjects that was composed after the Nuremberg trials of the Nazi war criminals in 1946–47. The central feature of the Nuremberg Code is contained in its first clause, which states that “The voluntary consent of the subject is absolutely essential.”
But during the government's SAR-CoV-2 management practices, these rights were discovered to be no-existent. They had been unceremoniously stripped from us during the historic Labour Government's tenure and replaced with much lesser rights in the "NZ Bill Of Rights".
For me and many others, this is a biting insult to all the sacrifices my whanau (family and ancestors) have made over hundreds of years for human rights. For all of us, these rights are the only things that separate us from owning our own life, and being owned by some other entity or device.
ANZAC Day will never be the same as government officials stand there saying their words about 'freedom' but failing to uphold it in their actions.
Some images that will never leave me:
A Government slogan for taking away your rights, a little reverse psychology: "Unlock The Things You Love" when in reality it was only the government locking them up.
The 'vaccine passport' was an attempt to launch a human control platform that would seriously limit your ability to function in today's modern society.
This picture reminds me of one I saw in my history books.
A very slippery slope to have adopted.
"The Problem is the Unvaccinated"
It is a FACT that it is an experiment simply because they do not know the outcome.
Method of convincing someone:
- State a fact "The sky in blue"
- State a second fact "The sea is blue"
- State something you want people to believe: So therefore "The land is blue"
- State a fact "Vaccines Protect and are safe and effective"
- State a second fact * "mRNA serum is also called a vaccine" (this was only achieved by changing the definition of what a vaccine is)
- Link fiction to the facts: "Therefore because the mRNA is a vaccine it is also safe and effective."
* the definition of 'vaccine' was changed during Covid to include mRNA
Open this video in. YouTube and go to the 5 minute mark to see the answer.
- Eat Healthy and review what your body needs to maintain a healthy function
- Daily exercise
- Sunlight exposure
- Drink fresh clean water
- Cut out the bad habits
Comments and Reply's
The Maori and Patagonians lived the natural healthy life style but that didn’t work. I was reading the journey of the Beagle in which Darwin describes in diary form his experiences in Patagonia. They were tough strong people but died easily against viruses.
The evidence on closed societies where multiculturalism had not existed previously, as in the races you discuss, is that their biodiversity was not as comprehensive at the time of meeting other cultures.
This caused an adjustment period and people unfortunately succumbed to pathogens that they have not been previously exposed to.
The answer to this issue is to identify and capture a pathogen/virus; weaken it, and introduce it to the person's natural immune system so it can learn how to handle the "entire biology of the assailant".
This creates a very strong natural immunity that is passed on from mother to child and maintains society's health in a very progressive manner
We call this process 'vaccination' and I am 100% in favor of it.
Natural immunity requires nutrition to maintain its effectiveness but our society has been converted from natural foods, to scientifically created ones that weaken the immune system and this is a fact.
Many cultures and generations are prone to gravitate to these failing diets and so natural immunity declines in efficacy as well as creating the increase in 'other cause' hospitalisation which was at pandemic levels way before Covid-19 came along.
mRNA is a completely different technology to the historical definition of 'vaccine' and no matter what the short term research suggests, only in time will we know the result.
If it wasn't for the recent change in the definition of the word, 'vaccine', mRNA would have to be described as a drug and not a vaccine.
Try for yourself. Instead of using the word 'vaccine' to describe mRNA, call it what it is, 'a drug whose outcome over a period of time is unknown as of yet' and your thoughts on the subject may change.
I appreciate that some people trust science but I have seen far too many errors in science and medicine, and I have far too much experience to accept the unproven hypothesis that mRNA works until historically recognised test procedures have been completed and the hypothesis is replaced by absolute facts.
For example; is the theorised immunity created by mRNA passed on to the newborn or will all newborns require the mRNA drug at birth and if so, how often will they require a booster and at each dose, what is the possibility of serious adverse effects?
Time will tell but the question can only be answered by honesty and unfortunately honesty has been replaced with mandated coercion and that is simply a red flag that we should all be concerned about.
The 'public safety untested drug movement' simply wants the truth and in the failure to deliver an unbiased review of mRNA, the powers to be cause their own problems.
The lack of answers by the Government has been a very strong insult to many qualified people and the targeting of the 'unvaccinated' as being the problem is most definitely the recreation of apartheid, a false approach to resolving this pandemic, and has long lasting consequences.
I have seen first hand the effect of the mRNA injection and I have also seen the results of natural immunity. Natural Immunity is scientifically proven to be more long lasting and comprehensive. It is pretty compelling stuff but science would like for us to ignore this in favor of their patented technology that makes them rich. When money is involved, it is very difficult to trust some people and drug manufacturers have an exceptionally bad track record.