Is this the error that could halt the Mandates?

I realised that the people who got the mRNA injection must have had to agree to get it. 

'Informed Consent' is what you would need to conduct an experiment with a potential vaccine and sure enough you do!

I called into a pharmacy in Tauranga CBD who offer the injection and asked;

"What's the worst that can happen to me?"

The young assistant replied "A sore arm". 

Confused, I asked 'Is that all. What about death. Can it result in death?'.

It went a bit pear-shaped at that moment with the assistant coughing and spluttering a few frustrated words. I tried to point out that even a paracetamol pack has full disclosure so why isn't the Pfizer vaccine required to be processed in the same way?

The chemist came over to try to sort it out. I asked for all information they had. (see below).

I asked again; "What is the worst that can happen to me if I get the jab?"

The chemist was trying to think of what to say. I gave him an out; "How about myocarditis?"

He wasn't sure to answer so I read the "Consent Form" I was required to sign to get the Jab. 

No mention of anything that serious.

I said 'At what point do you disclose the full possible side effects?'. He said that what they had was all they were instructed to say. I took everything that they offered and you can see it all below. Carefully scripted documents deliberately misinforming people. Playing it down.

This means that technically, all people who have had the jab have not been correctly informed. 

The full possible side effects have been deliberately omitted. 

I wonder if that invalidates all consents?

If this was a financial prospectus it would be deemed 'Failure to inform participants' and quite possibly, fraud.

I am not against vaccination. But I am for people's right to know the full truth. Informed Consent.

The fact that there is a Consent Form that must be signed tells me that this was a 'legal contract' which has a  requirement to disclose ALL the relevant information. When you are MANDATED to get the Jab how does anyone actually agree? They are being Coerced with 'No Jab, No Job' Government laws and then when they go to get the Jab, they are not being informed of all the side effects.

What part of this is legal?

Coerced:

persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.

"he was coerced into giving evidence"

If it was evidence given in a court of law, it would be thrown out and anyone doing the coercion would be prosecuted. Hmm, I may have to file another police report.

Getting the right information matters. 

It sure does!

Nowhere in the following documents does it mention the serious side effects.

I have contacted all the places the brochure says I can get accurate information. I can definitely say that I have not had my questions answered. If you have, please let me know.

After the vaccine, my research recommends also:

1. Do not do physical exercise for a while

2. Do not get hair dye for a while

This is where it gets tricky.
Here is what you are agreeing to:

1. I have read the COVID-19 information provided, and/or have had explained to me information about the COVID-19 vaccine.
2. I have had a chance to ask questions and they were answered to my satisfaction
3. I believe I understand the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination
4. I understand it is my choice to get the COVID-19 vaccination
5. I understand I will need 2 doses of the Pfizer vaccine to have the best protection

Clause 3 and 4 just astound me!

So legally, it has to be your choice BUT, if you don't do it, you lose your job, income, livelihood and you will also be slowly excluded from society.

This is a Human Rights Issue.