Skip to main content

Is this the error that could halt the Mandates?

I realised that the people who got the mRNA injection must have had to agree to get it. 

'Informed Consent' is what you would need to conduct an experiment with a potential vaccine and sure enough you do!

I called into a pharmacy in Tauranga CBD who offer the injection and asked;
"What's the worst that can happen to me?"

The young assistant replied "A sore arm". 
Confused, I asked 'Is that all. What about death. Can it result in death?'.

It went a bit pear-shaped at that moment with the assistant coughing and spluttering a few frustrated words. I tried to point out that even a paracetamol pack has full disclosure so why isn't the Pfizer vaccine required to be processed in the same way?

The chemist came over to try to sort it out. I asked for all information they had. (see below).

I asked again; "What is the worst that can happen to me if I get the jab?"
The chemist was trying to think of what to say. I gave him an out; "How about myocarditis?"

He wasn't sure to answer so I read the "Consent Form" I was required to sign to get the Jab. 
No mention of anything that serious.

I said 'At what point do you disclose the full possible side effects?'. He said that what they had was all they were instructed to say. I took everything that they offered and you can see it all below. Carefully scripted documents deliberately misinforming people. Playing it down.

This means that technically, all people who have had the jab have not been correctly informed. 
The full possible side effects have been deliberately omitted. 

I wonder if that invalidates all consents?
If this was a financial prospectus it would be deemed 'Failure to inform participants' and quite possibly, fraud.

I am not against vaccination. But I am for people's right to know the full truth. Informed Consent.

The fact that there is a Consent Form that must be signed tells me that this was a 'legal contract' which has a  requirement to disclose ALL the relevant information. When you are MANDATED to get the Jab how does anyone actually agree? They are being Coerced with 'No Jab, No Job' Government laws and then when they go to get the Jab, they are not being informed of all the side effects.

What part of this is legal?

persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.
"he was coerced into giving evidence"

If it was evidence given in a court of law, it would be thrown out and anyone doing the coercion would be prosecuted. Hmm, I may have to file another police report.

Getting the right information matters
It sure does!
Nowhere in the following documents does it mention the serious side effects.

I have contacted all the places the brochure says I can get accurate information. I can definitely say that I have not had my questions answered. If you have, please let me know.

After the vaccine, my research recommends also:
1. Do not do physical exercise for a while
2. Do not get hair dye for a while

This is where it gets tricky.
Here is what you are agreeing to:

  1. I have read the COVID-19 information provided, and/or have had explained to me information about the COVID-19 vaccine.
  2. I have had a chance to ask questions and they were answered to my satisfaction
  3. I believe I understand the benefits and risks of COVID-19 vaccination
  4. I understand it is my choice to get the COVID-19 vaccination
  5. I understand I will need 2 doses of the Pfizer vaccine to have the best protection
Clause 3 and 4 just astound me!

So legally, it has to be your choice BUT, if you don't do it, you lose your job, income, livelihood and you will also be slowly excluded from society.
This is a Human Rights Issue.


Popular posts from this blog

How many at Wellington Freedom March? 9/11/2021 Aotearoa - New Zealand

The film below is about 20 minutes long. Voices for Freedom My body, my choice Unjabbed NZ Community 1947 Nuremberg Code 1947 - that we all used to be protected by until 'The Bill of Rights' changed it to what we have now, 'the government can decide' please let me know who else was there.

Memorial Park - 04-12-2021

Meeting at Memorial Park - Tauranga As I accumulate factual data, it is becoming evident that the 'pro vax' do not actually understand much. They typically see this as an 'Antivaxx movement' perpetrated by the 'crazies'. I ask them about their research and it is truly sketchy what they actually know. The last time I saw people talk like the 'vaxxed', it was when interviewers were asking Republican supporters why they were voting for Donald Trump. They don't know much. For example:  1: They think the mRNA serum is the same as the polio or measles vaccine. FACT: mRNA is a new technology, still under experimentation, that has never worked before.  It is completely different and is NOT a vaccine by definition. 2: They think the mRNA serum is safe. FACT: The serum is released under a 'Provisional Approval,' valid until 3/11/2023  ( Medsafe Approval Link ) It is promoted as being safe because of the number of shots processed worldwide. FACT: The lo

2: Research

Some Questions 2019 and a 'new' virus is attacking the human respiratory system. It is highly contagious and has a high level of mortality. Questions   Where did it come from and why? How is it transmitted? Why is the virus highly contagious? Why are some infected people recovering while others are not? The immune system would normally defend you but for some it isn't. Why? What makes someone an 'At Risk' candidate? Why are there variants? What are the solutions being presented? What is a vaccine? What are the possible effects of the vaccine? How does the world progress? I know a little, but nowhere near enough. I need to study. What follows is the sequence I used to discover and accumulate the knowledge to form an educated opinion.  I have provided references to the resources to show my appreciation for the people who have spent so much time and effort to help us become educated. We will be developing our opinion from the efforts of many thousands of people.  Take